lifelibertyhonor2.jpg

On religion and politics and a separation of church and state:

Home
America's Core Values
Civics & Society
Patriotism & Resistance Journal
Wise Governance
God & Politics
Elections & Campaigns
On War and the Military
Foolish Theoretical Foreign Policy
Broadcast Betrayal
The Stampeders
On Economic Issues
Humor, Satire & Parody
Immigration
The Ultimate Indictment of Christian Hypocrisy
Lietta Ruger: Crawford Tx, and Bring Them Home Now
Contact Arthur

December 2004
 
I've heard repeatedly that Europeans are astounded at the degree of religious involvment in the USA which has historically represented a mythological image of a free people unfettered by personal suppression based on religion. Within that myth we have experienced growing pains - years of conflict and pain of other aspects of that having to do with coming to maturity with such things as valuing diversity in the culture as well as moving into modernity in terms of minority rights.
 
But with religion, in many ways, we are seen globally as moving toward our own version of a Taliban government.
 
We can encounter advocates who insist that the Founding Fathers intended a Christian Nation as well as advocates who insist that nothing of the sort was the original intent. I tend to agree with the latter.
 
Common sense suggests the the highest good of all the people concerned is the ultimate national priority. Mr. Paine expressed it as "Wherefore, security being the true design and end of government, it unanswerably follows that whatever form thereof appears most likely to ensure it to us, with the least expense and greatest benefit, is preferable to all others."
 
Security in this sense is not limited to that contemplated in a presidential war room. Security in this sense is the highest good of all concerned.
 
Common sense suggests that one of the more powerful ways to integrate the values of our national diversity would be to move in the direction of a "national ethic" as opposed to a "national morality." Such a move obviously is not easy because it suggests a repudiation of what many consider to be the basis of what America is = a moral entity.
 
One of the weaknesses in any organized religion with fixed religious dogmas that reflect an alternate spiritual reality is that its members often remain "in" the world but not "of" the world. The values of that society become absolute and inerrant. For many people, there is an absolute security in having such as a fundamental base of values. The consequence then is a tendency to look at non-members as "other" and slip into an "us/them" viewpoint which is not for from "either you're with us or against us."
 
Common sense suggests that we ought to advocate taking our America away from all special interests and claim it as belonging to all the people. The common bond made powerful and influential seems to be that of working out what America stands for in terms of ethics based on the value of the highest good of all concerned rather than in terms of morality. Moralitycan only be established nationally by coercion by whichever moral society dominates or triumphs.
 
We do not have to deny any citizen's god. We do not have to find ourselves in the absurd position of trying to figure out whose god is supreme as General Boykin so strongly works to do. We do not find ourselves in the absurd position of having to somehow reconcile Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson saying - immediately after 9/11 - that God has removed his hand of protection from the United States because of our tolerance of gays, abortion and pornography.
 
And we then do not have to tolerate political attempts to divert us from serious discussion of war and economics with dramatic and rhetorical declarations against who-marries-who, who prays where, what religious icons stand in front of judicial buildings and whether or not God has appointed someone to lead the people to a promised salvation.
 
We would not find ourselves so dominated by a religious power believing in a formal End Times which lobbies our government to work to make Israel look like it did thousands of years ago so as to faciliate the end of all things in which most of our diverse population will be Left Behind for not believing.
 
Ethics, not morality, stands a better chance of creating a strong national character and citizen self-identity.
Arthur Ruger 2004

Arthur & Lietta Ruger 2002-2008. The American Choice is a  political internet journal based in Bay Center, Washington. The views expressed not authored by Arthur or Lietta Ruger are the writers' own and do not necessarily reflect those of The American Choice or SwanDeer Productions. Permission of author required for reprinting original material, and only requests for reprinting a specific item are considered.

mailto:arthur@swandeer.com