God and Civic Involvement

America's Core Values
Civics & Society
Patriotism & Resistance Journal
Wise Governance
God & Politics
Elections & Campaigns
On War and the Military
Foolish Theoretical Foreign Policy
Broadcast Betrayal
The Stampeders
On Economic Issues
Humor, Satire & Parody
The Ultimate Indictment of Christian Hypocrisy
Lietta Ruger: Crawford Tx, and Bring Them Home Now
Contact Arthur


Many of us when we hear the words "Protestant Reformation" think of Martin Luther. We think of his powerful points challenging an established religion and its priests about their behavior; ... challenging how they had twisted doctrine to support and sustain their considerable social authority.

If in his dissent Luther had great fear for his salvation and the correctness of his redefinition of religion, he dealt with that concern very well. Subsequent events are proof that one person's absolutes are not the absolutes of another and that God was never on the side of one at the expense of the other.
Had the Catholic absolutes of that time been the absolutes of God - and the Roman authorities certainly attempted and succeeded in many cases intimidating those who agreed with Luther - God would not have allowed the rise of Protestantism into the "formal" status it has today.
Likewise, this on-going convulsion in America will never be subject to a god of civics, patriotism or nationalism who will ultimately intervene and establish what it means to be a worthy citizen. In thinking literally and inerrantly - as the Catholic priesthood had for years insisted it was doing on behalf of all Christians - successful suppression of the Protestant movement leading to its extinction would have been seen as a repudiation of dissent and of the Protestant movement by God Himself.
Obvious now is the fact that God did not intervene on the side of those who pretended to a possession of absolute biblical Christian truth. If there was repudiation, it was at the least an indication that the harsh, inflexible and unchanging God was in fact an illusion.
I feel that this analogy has legitimacy with that "other topic we're not to discuss in groups" - politics.
Today Americans find themselves widely divided over authority, the literal definition of what it means to be a good citizen, a loyal American and a real patriot. Conflict between the long-time military knee-jerk tradition of not challenging the civilian leadership has collided big time now with the open attempt to exploit military strength through lies and manipulation.
This remains a battle for the heart and soul of what it means to be American in a global society dominated by who we are as well as what we have become. As openly rigid, doctrinaire, inflexible and driven by greed as so many at the apex of government abetted by soulless lobbyists have been, it has become evident that we cannot demonize or vilify everyone who has and does disagree with us.
Here on the ground level, for the most part we are not in conflict with persons who consciously and deliberately support a cynical and manipulative squandering of American blood, influence and wealth. Most of those on the streets where we live now advocate for the essentially the same things.
The difference is in doctrine and form. And at this ground zero level where we march, we speak, we argue and we agitate, the ultimate removal of American blood from harm's way will not result in a victory in our streets of who was right over who was wrong.
Such would be a false victory in that both sides would lose.
Back to religion, the success of the historical Protestant Reformation might be best described as a win/win circumstance in that God did not repudiate one point of view at the expense of the other. Both points of view survived and both remain powerfully connected to God and Christ today. But the weakness of that victory demonstrates itself among Catholics and Protestants who remain
This compares to the more than 225 years of experience living under a Constitution that, in its own way, is one of the most successful historical documents ever. In our history we have seen the evolution of a multi-faceted society based not only on religion and philosophy, but on cultural diversity without which our positive American mythology of a melting pot came to be part of our national psyche.
Under our Constitution we have seen the growth of a habitual way of looking at things - an automatic stance if you will - that allows for diversity of opinion and the freedom to express opinion. A renewal of civic consciousness in this country should not be about legislative, executive or judicial imposition of a political or religious ideology. It should be about dialogue over differences and an honest look at the highest good of all concerned.
The ultimate lesson we are still learning is that political ideology and untrammeled corporate priority cannot not be the basis for seeking government power at the expense of society as a whole.
If we are to reform our moral and ethical practices in this country, we need to define our citizenship in relationship to our power as a diverse society, our prosperity as a tool of reform, our dominant position on a global scale as an instrument of advocating peace, our spiritual and cultural values as a means toward compassion toward one another.
Arthur Ruger 2007

Arthur & Lietta Ruger 2002-2008. The American Choice is a  political internet journal based in Bay Center, Washington. The views expressed not authored by Arthur or Lietta Ruger are the writers' own and do not necessarily reflect those of The American Choice or SwanDeer Productions. Permission of author required for reprinting original material, and only requests for reprinting a specific item are considered.